Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|
Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Boros Convoke , Boros Mice , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Counters , Gruul Delirium , Gruul Leyline , Izzet Aggro , Mono Red Goblins
Twisted Fealty ranks #262 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 63%).
Red average: 63.8%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Twisted Fealty is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 25.00 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.0%. Twisted Fealty has a win rate of 75.0%, making it 1.3% better than other 3-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 6 | 36.1% | 1 |
Urabrask's Forge | Artifact | 9 | 27.8% | 2 |
Monastery Swiftspear | Creature — Human Monk | 10 | 25.0% | 2 |
Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 7 | 24.8% | 1 |
Burst Lightning | Instant | 12 | 24.2% | 2 |
Screaming Nemesis | Creature — Spirit | 12 | 24.2% | 2 |
Manifold Mouse | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 12 | 24.2% | 2 |
Hired Claw | Creature — Lizard Mercenary | 12 | 24.2% | 2 |
Heartfire Hero | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 12 | 24.2% | 2 |
Emberheart Challenger | Creature — Mouse Warrior | 12 | 24.2% | 2 |
Cards that perform better with Twisted Fealty than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Red Deck Wins | 470 | 33.8% | 52.9% |
Gruul Aggro | 158 | 7.6% | 41.6% |
Boros Burn | 27 | 6.8% | 38.7% |
Gruul Leyline | 12 | 6.2% | 28.5% |
Naya Aggro | 9 | 69.2% | 43.8% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.